Tag: Q n A, Bukhari

  • question #3 Sahih al-Bukhari 6904, Book 87, Hadith 43 : How does Islamic jurisprudence address conflicts and injuries between individuals?

    Q
    How does Islamic jurisprudence address conflicts and injuries between individuals?


    A

    Two women from the tribe of Hudhail (fought with each other) and one of them threw (a stone at) the
    other, causing her to have a miscarriage and Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) gave his verdict that the killer (of the
    fetus) should give a male or female slave (as a Diya).

    Referensi:

    Sahih al-Bukhari 6904, Book 87, Hadith 43
  • question #3 Sahih al-Bukhari 6901, Book 87, Hadith 40 : What are the consequences of invading someone’s privacy according to Islamic principles?

    Q
    What are the consequences of invading someone’s privacy according to Islamic principles?


    A

    A man peeped through a hole in the door of Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ)’s house,
    and at that time, Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) had a Midri (an iron comb or bar)
    with which he was rubbing his head. So when Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) saw him,
    he said (to him), “If I had been sure that you were looking at me
    (through the door), I would have poked your eye with this (sharp iron
    bar).” Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) added, “The asking for permission to enter has
    been enjoined so that one may not look unlawfully (at what there is in
    the house without the permission of its people).”

    Referensi:

    Sahih al-Bukhari 6901, Book 87, Hadith 40
  • question #3 Sahih al-Bukhari 6902, Book 87, Hadith 41 : What is the significance of personal privacy and boundaries in Islamic teachings?

    Q
    What is the significance of personal privacy and boundaries in Islamic teachings?


    A

    Abul Qasim said, “If any person peeps at you without your permission and you poke him with a stick
    and injure his eye, you will not be blamed.”

    Referensi:

    Sahih al-Bukhari 6902, Book 87, Hadith 41
  • question #3 Sahih al-Bukhari 6899, Book 87, Hadith 38 : What are the implications of false oaths in the context of Islamic legal proceedings?

    Q
    What are the implications of false oaths in the context of Islamic legal proceedings?


    A

    Once `Umar bin `Abdul `Aziz sat on his throne in the courtyard of his house so that the people might
    gather before him. Then he admitted them and (when they came in), he said, “What do you think of
    Al-Qasama?” They said, “We say that it is lawful to depend on Al-Qasama in Qisas, as the previous
    Muslim Caliphs carried out Qisas depending on it.” Then he said to me, “O Abu Qilaba! What do you
    say about it?” He let me appear before the people and I said, “O Chief of the Believers! You have the
    chiefs of the army staff and the nobles of the Arabs. If fifty of them testified that a married man had
    committed illegal sexual intercourse in Damascus but they had not seen him (doing so), would you
    stone him?” He said, “No.” I said, “If fifty of them testified that a man had committed theft in Hums,
    would you cut off his hand though they did not see him?” He replied, “No.”
    I said, “By Allah, Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) never killed anyone except in one of the following three situations:
    (1) A person who killed somebody unjustly, was killed (in Qisas,) (2) a married person who
    committed illegal sexual intercourse and (3) a man who fought against Allah and His Apostle and
    deserted Islam and became an apostate.”
    Then the people said, “Didn’t Anas bin Malik narrate that Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) cut off the hands of the
    thieves, branded their eyes and then, threw them in the sun?”
    I said, “I shall tell you the narration of Anas. Anas said: “Eight persons from the tribe of `Ukl came to
    Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) and gave the Pledge of allegiance for Islam (became Muslim). The climate of the
    place (Medina) did not suit them, so they became sick and complained about that to Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ).
    He said (to them ), “Won’t you go out with the shepherd of our camels and drink of the camels’ milk
    and urine (as medicine)?” They said, “Yes.” So they went out and drank the camels’ milk and urine,
    and after they became healthy, they killed the shepherd of Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) and took away all the
    camels. This news reached Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) , so he sent (men) to follow their traces and they were
    captured and brought (to the Prophet). He then ordered to cut their hands and feet, and their eyes were
    branded with heated pieces of iron, and then he threw them in the sun till they died.” I said, “What can
    be worse than what those people did? They deserted Islam, committed murder and theft.”
    Then ‘Anbasa bin Sa`id said, “By Allah, I never heard a narration like this of today.” I said, “O
    ‘Anbasa! You deny my narration?” ‘Anbasa said, “No, but you have related the narration in the way it
    should be related. By Allah, these people are in welfare as long as this Sheikh (Abu Qilaba) is among
    them.” I added, “Indeed in this event there has been a tradition set by Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ). The narrator
    added: Some Ansari people came to the Prophet (ﷺ) and discussed some matters with him, a man from
    amongst them went out and was murdered. Those people went out after him, and behold, their
    companion was swimming in blood. They returned to Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) and said to him, “O Allah’s
    Apostle, we have found our companion who had talked with us and gone out before us, swimming in
    blood (killed).” Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) went out and asked them, “Whom do you suspect or whom do you
    think has killed him?” They said, “We think that the Jews have killed him.” The Prophet (ﷺ) sent for the
    Jews and asked them, “Did you kill this (person)?” They replied, “No.” He asked the Al-Ansars, “Do
    you agree that I let fifty Jews take an oath that they have not killed him?” They said, “It matters little
    for the Jews to kill us all and then take false oaths.” He said, “Then would you like to receive the Diya
    after fifty of you have taken an oath (that the Jews have killed your man)?” They said, “We will not
    take the oath.” Then the Prophet (ﷺ) himself paid them the Diya (Blood-money).” The narrator added,
    “The tribe of Hudhail repudiated one of their men (for his evil conduct) in the Pre-lslamic period of
    Ignorance.
    Then, at a place called Al-Batha’ (near Mecca), the man attacked a Yemenite family at night to steal
    from them, but a. man from the family noticed him and struck him with his sword and killed him. The
    tribe of Hudhail came and captured the Yemenite and brought him to `Umar during the Hajj season
    and said, “He has killed our companion.” The Yemenite said, “But these people had repudiated him
    (i.e., their companion).” `Umar said, “Let fifty persons of Hudhail swear that they had not repudiated
    him.” So forty-nine of them took the oath and then a person belonging to them, came from Sham and
    they requested him to swear similarly, but he paid one-thousand Dirhams instead of taking the oath.
    They called another man instead of him and the new man shook hands with the brother of the
    deceased. Some people said, “We and those fifty men who had taken false oaths (Al-Qasama) set out,
    and when they reached a place called Nakhlah, it started raining so they entered a cave in the
    mountain, and the cave collapsed on those fifty men who took the false oath, and all of them died
    except the two persons who had shaken hands with each other. They escaped death but a stone fell on
    the leg of the brother of the deceased and broke it, whereupon he survived for one year and then died.”
    I further said, “`Abdul Malik bin Marwan sentenced a man to death in Qisas (equality in punishment)
    for murder, basing his judgment on Al-Qasama, but later on he regretted that judgment and ordered
    that the names of the fifty persons who had taken the oath (Al-Qasama), be erased from the register,
    and he exiled them in Sham.”

    Referensi:

    Sahih al-Bukhari 6899, Book 87, Hadith 38
  • question #3 Sahih al-Bukhari 6900, Book 87, Hadith 39 : What measures are permissible in Islam to protect one’s privacy from intruders?

    Q
    What measures are permissible in Islam to protect one’s privacy from intruders?


    A

    A man peeped into one of the dwelling places of the Prophet. The
    Prophet got up and aimed a sharp-edged arrow head (or wooden stick) at
    him to poke him stealthily.

    Referensi:

    Sahih al-Bukhari 6900, Book 87, Hadith 39
  • question #3 Sahih al-Bukhari 6897, Book 87, Hadith 36 : What does this incident reveal about the Prophet’s approach to medicine and treatment during illness?

    Q
    What does this incident reveal about the Prophet’s approach to medicine and treatment during illness?


    A

    We poured medicine into the mouth of Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) during his illness, and he pointed out to us
    intending to say, “Don’t pour medicine into my mouth.” We thought that his refusal was out of the
    aversion a patient usually has for medicine. When he improved and felt a bit better he said (to us.)
    “Didn’t I forbid you to pour medicine into my mouth?” We said, “We thought (you did so) because of
    the aversion, one usually have for medicine.” Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) said, “There is none of you but will be
    forced to drink medicine, and I will watch you, except Al-`Abbas, for he did not witness this act of
    yours.”

    Referensi:

    Sahih al-Bukhari 6897, Book 87, Hadith 36
  • question #3 Sahih al-Bukhari 6898, Book 87, Hadith 37 : What role does the concept of Diya (Blood-money) play in Islamic justice?

    Q
    What role does the concept of Diya (Blood-money) play in Islamic justice?


    A

    (a man from the Ansar) that a number of people from his tribe went to Khaibar and dispersed, and
    then they found one of them murdered. They said to the people with whom the corpse had been found,
    “You have killed our companion!” Those people said, “Neither have we killed him, nor do we know
    his killer.” The bereaved group went to the Prophet (ﷺ) and said, “O Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ)! We went to Khaibar
    and found one of us murdered.” The Prophet (ﷺ) said, “Let the older among you come forward and
    speak.” Then the Prophet (ﷺ) said, to them, “Bring your proof against the killer.” They said “We have no
    proof.” The Prophet (ﷺ) said, “Then they (the defendants) will take an oath.” They said, “We do not accept
    the oaths of the Jews.” Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) did not like that the Blood-money of the killed one be lost
    without compensation, so he paid one-hundred camels out of the camels of Zakat (to the relatives of
    the deceased) as Diya (Blood-money).

    Referensi:

    Sahih al-Bukhari 6898, Book 87, Hadith 37
  • question #3 Sahih al-Bukhari 6895, Book 87, Hadith 33 : What might be the purpose of using simple comparisons to explain complex concepts in Islam?

    Q
    What might be the purpose of using simple comparisons to explain complex concepts in Islam?


    A

    The Prophet (ﷺ) said, “This and this are the same.” He meant the little finger and the thumb.

    Referensi:

    Sahih al-Bukhari 6895, Book 87, Hadith 33
  • question #3 Sahih al-Bukhari 6896, Book 87, Hadith 35 : What are the implications of collective responsibility in Islamic jurisprudence as demonstrated by ‘Umar’s statement regarding the assassination?

    Q
    What are the implications of collective responsibility in Islamic jurisprudence as demonstrated by ‘Umar’s statement regarding the assassination?


    A

    A boy was assassinated. ‘Umar said, “If all the people of San’a took part in the assassination I would kill them all.”Al-Mughira bin Hakim said that his father said, “Four persons killed a boy, and ‘Umar said (as above).”Abu Bakr, Ibn Az-Zubair, ‘Ali and Suwaid bin Muqarrin gave the judgement of Al-Qisas (equality in punishment) in cases of slapping. And ‘Umar carried out Al-Qisas for a strike with a stick. And ‘Ali carried out Al-Qisas for three lashes with a whip. And Shuraih carried out for one last and for scratching.

    Referensi:

    Sahih al-Bukhari 6896, Book 87, Hadith 35
  • question #3 Sahih al-Bukhari 6893, Book 87, Hadith 31 : What are the implications of the Prophet’s actions in resolving disputes during military expeditions?

    Q
    What are the implications of the Prophet’s actions in resolving disputes during military expeditions?


    A

    I went out in one of the Ghazwa and a man bit another man and as a result, an incisor tooth of the
    former was pulled out. The Prophet (ﷺ) cancelled the case.

    Referensi:

    Sahih al-Bukhari 6893, Book 87, Hadith 31